3 Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy

This is part 7 in a 7-part post.

At this point in the conversation, having looked at the five primary relationships people experience in the harmonic vibrancy of the group, it starts to seem like a bit much.  Five relationships experienced at three different levels.  I take this feeling of fullness as an opportunity to summarize what people have described so far.  When people experience greater harmonic vibrancy, which is what they want, all relationships are taken care of, and through those relationships they accomplish more.  Conversely, when people experience less vibrancy, which they do not want, it is hard to pay attention to relationships, and everyone does what they can alone, accomplishing much less.

What I have seen, when I share this summary, is that someone will speak up, saying that this sounds like a set of principles – guiding principles.  Starting from abundance, all relationships work together to generate a higher vibrancy.  Starting from scarcity, the lack of relationship generates a lower vibrancy.  The figure below shows this.  The inner circle describes the experience of the lack of relationship in all five relationships.  Likewise, the middle circle describes the experience of medium vibrancy in all relationships, and the outer circle describes the experience of high vibrancy in all five relationships.

 

The questions now begin to focus the conversation, finding that the experience is that of the inner circle, or the middle circle, or the outer circle.  My curiosity about this question as a researcher over the last eighteen years has taken me to teachers who have taught me why it is difficult to see these agreements.  From decision theory, I saw that the judgments people make are full of assumptions of values that others and I have and of how things work.  From systems theory, I saw that the relationships among the actors and the decisions they make generate dynamics that determine system-wide behaviors that are different than what the individuals want or see.  From integral theory, I saw the importance of including the different lenses or perspectives on agreements and transcending them to a higher, more integral perspective.

Interweaving these lessons learned helped me see the harmonic in the stories.  When I asked, some say this experience of the harmonic is like ice cream.  One person is describing the experience of taste – it is all about the sweetness, while another is describing texture – it is all about being both smooth and crunchy, yet another is describing temperature – it is all about being cold, while another describes appearance – it is all about the colors of the cream, cone, and sprinkles.  While each is partially correct, they all describe a critical dimension, bringing in an important voice, and none is complete on its own.  Ice cream is about the perfect combination of taste, texture, temperature, and appearance.  Nobody wants just sweet, just smooth and crunchy, just cold, or just colorful.  Others liken it to music, where the richest songs that move us most have rich harmonies, where each voice contributes to the harmonic, yet no voice alone sings it.

Now comes the realization of the agreements driving the experience of scarcity or abundance in any group.  People are choosing to experience lower vibrancy most of the time.  That’s the inner circle of scarcity.  Why would they do that?  Maybe because they are not aware that it was an agreement they were making.  Could they make different agreements?  It is easy to see how they can make different agreements, sometimes.  But it seems hard to figure out what this means for different groups.  It gets pretty complicated.  Or does it?  In Tom Robbins’ saga of the many facets of the beet, Jitterbug Perfume, Dr. Dannyboy summarizes what he has learned, “The universe does not have laws.  It has habits.  And habits can be broken.”[1]

My request to you

I invite you to share here your own experiences of these relationships to the harmonic vibrancy you experience.


[1] See (Robbins, 1990, p. 312).

Advertisements

33 thoughts on “3 Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy

  1. Pingback: The “on-the-level” Path | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  2. Pingback: The “enlightened noun-ness” path | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  3. Pingback: Lenses for Seeing Agreements | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  4. Pingback: Questions Emerging with Each Lens on the Agreements | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  5. Pingback: Abundance of “How Much” | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  6. Pingback: Reflections on Value — the Lens of “What Do I Experience?” | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  7. Pingback: History of Thinking about Resources, Organization, and Value | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  8. Pingback: I am sitting IN the harmonic vibrancy! | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  9. Pingback: Ecosynomics at ISBAN, a world-class bank « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  10. Pingback: Recession = Healthy relationships with collapsed resources or Collapsed relationships with healthy resources « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  11. Pingback: Abundance in Relationship ≠ Excess « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  12. Pingback: Guest post — 17 European groups living into the ecosynomic paradigm – initial insights (#1 in a 5-part series) « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  13. Pingback: Vibrancy Activity in Mexico « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  14. Pingback: Guest post — Similar fundamental assumptions found in 17 European groups living the Ecosynomic paradigm (#4 in a 5-part series) « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  15. Pingback: 4 Questions that Changed the World « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  16. Pingback: Experiencing Abundance in a Moment of Possibility — Two Recent Books « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  17. Pingback: Perceived Levels of Reality « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  18. Pingback: Three Levels of Perceived Reality and Three Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  19. Pingback: Integrating Possibility, Development, and Things « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  20. Pingback: The “On-the-Level” Path « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  21. Pingback: The “Enlightened Noun-ness” Path « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  22. Pingback: Lenses for Seeing Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  23. Pingback: Questions Emerging with Each Lens on the Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  24. Pingback: Abundance of “How Much” « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  25. Pingback: Seeing the Light-Resources in All Primary Relationships « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  26. Pingback: Reflections on Value — the Lens of “What Do I Experience?” « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  27. Pingback: Big Questions about the Harmonic of Human Interactions « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  28. Pingback: You Unconsciously Broadcast Your Agreements — Recommended Reading « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  29. Pingback: A Common Object-ive Is Not a Deeper Shared Purpose — How to Know the Difference « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  30. Pingback: Agreements Field Mapping « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  31. Pingback: The Whole Agreements Field Is Always Active–Sometimes Towards Purpose, Often Not « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  32. Pingback: Is Your Awful Day Better Than My Okay Day? — The Hills and Valleys of Human Agreements — Seemingly Similar Terrain, Different Map « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  33. Pingback: The Metamemetics and Epimemetics of What Homo lumens Experiences in Human Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s