Zooming in on Your Agreements, from 500,000 ft to 50 ft

Most of us accept that the experiences we have every day are conditioned by realities we have to accept: “That is just the way things are.”  At the level of each experience, this certainly seems to be true.  I get paid for the work I did today, because that is what my labor contract specifies.  I pay for groceries with dollars, because that is what the federal bank provides as currency.  There is not much choice in this, from what I can see at this level.  What can I see if I zoom out from this 50-foot view of the specific experience to a 5,000-foot view of the system that directly influences my experience – from a view of the proverbial tree to the forest?

5,000-ft view through four lenses

From the 5,000-foot view, I can see that a series of assumptions determine the resources I have access to, who decides and enforces the rights of access to the resources, what is valued in my experience, and how I interact with others.  Is this system consistent everywhere always or is it dependent on higher level assumptions?  Zooming out to the 500,000-foot level, I can see the whole region within which those assumptions lie, observing that in different areas the assumptions are different.

500,000-ft view through four realms

From this 500,000-foot view, I see four realms of inquiry that have intrigued humanity for thousands of years: the economic, political, cultural, and social.  These four realms describe who makes and enforces the rules (politics) using what criteria (culture) about how people interact (social) and what people produce and exchange (economics).  I can see that in different regions of the earth and in different times, there have been very different ways that people have responded to what they see in each of these four realms.  There are many political systems, cultural systems, social systems, and economic systems over the time and space of human existence.  What do these four realms look like when I zoom back down to the 5,000-foot level of the specific system I live in?

Zooming in on your agreements

There seems to be a certain logical process to these four realms, at the 5,000-foot level.  What is there (who has what), who decides, with what criteria, and how do people interact?  The economic, the political, the cultural, and the social.  There are specific rules that I can see at this level that determine how we deal with the economics of resources, the politics of decisions, the culture of values, and the sociology of organization.  In earlier blogs, I have described these as four lenses (resources, decision, value, organization) through which I can see my experience.  Through these lenses, I begin to see that what seem like fixed rules – that’s just the way it is – vary significantly from one system to the next.  If they vary so much, then maybe they are not fixed rules, rather simply agreements that I have unconsciously accepted in my daily experience at the 50-foot level.

Is there only one job I can have?  Do I have to accept the conditions of the contract?  Is there only one currency I can access for getting my groceries?  When I look around, at other systems, I see that there are many options.  Other people have developed other responses, other agreements, when they looked from the four realms (500,000-ft view) through the four lenses (5,000-ft view) at what they wanted to experience on a daily basis (50-ft view).  They look at their work differently.  They have different conditions for their work.  They use different forms of currency.  I begin to see that these are all choices.  Choices designed at the 5,000-ft level, which I experience at the 50-ft level.  Choices that are guided by an evolution of what can be seen from the four realms at the 500,000-ft level.

50-ft view through the experience of my agreements

Daily life happens at the 50-ft level.  In that daily experience, someone decides and enforces who has access to what resources and how we interact, using some specific criteria.  The quality of these factors directly influences the quality of the vibrancy I experience.  If I want to experience greater vibrancy in that daily life, it seems important to occasionally zoom out to the 5,000-ft view to look through the four lenses at the system that influences my experience.  And, every once in awhile, it seems important to zoom out to the 500,000-ft level to examine the lenses I am using to design the system.

Maps for each level

To work with these three levels, we need a perspective, a theory of how they relate.  As Albert Einstein said, “Whether you can observe a thing or not depends on the theory which you use. It is the theory which decides what can be observed.”[1]  Cartographers have provided theory-based maps for each level.  Ecosynomics shows how the maps of these three levels fit together.  At the 50-ft level, we can use “agreements maps.” At the 5,000-ft level, we can use the four-lenses map.  At the 500,000-ft level, we can use the four-realms map.  These maps can inform what we see, as we zoom in and out, and the agreements we consciously choose to experience in our daily lives.

[1] Albert Einstein quote, as related by Werner Heisenberg, cited in Salam, A. (1990). Unification of Fundamental Forces. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 99.


20 thoughts on “Zooming in on Your Agreements, from 500,000 ft to 50 ft

  1. Pingback: From Whims to Rules to Principles, Glimpses of the Evolution of a Big Question, “Who Decides?” « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  2. Pingback: How “Compliance Practitioners” Choose Your Agreements For You — Recommended Reading « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  3. Pingback: My Qs — Agreements Based in Deficits « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  4. Pingback: 4 Scenarios of HUGE Success « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  5. Pingback: Seeing Your Agreements in 37 Words — Choosing Them in < 3 Tweets « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  6. Pingback: Why Agreements Are Hard to See or Why Agreements Are Like Sauerkraut and Bread « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  7. Pingback: What Specifically Differentiates High Vibrancy Groups from Everyone Else? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  8. Pingback: The Science of What You Know — Featureless Noise or Featureful Signal « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  9. Pingback: Ecosynomics — The Study of Negative Deviance — An Alternate Framing « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  10. Pingback: The Abundance of Scarcity — Reflections by Paul Saffo « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  11. Pingback: Ecosynomics — The Study of Deviance and Diversity in Human Agreements — Another Framing « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  12. Pingback: GRASPing Ecosynomic Lenses « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  13. Pingback: Is the State of Nature LOCKEd In or enLUMENSed? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  14. Pingback: Business Economics II | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  15. Pingback: Business Strategy II — ITAM Summer 2016 | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  16. Pingback: Agreements Field Mapping « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  17. Pingback: Vibrancy Is A Choice Checklists–Re-membering Abundance-based Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  18. Pingback: Vibrancy Is A Choice Checklists — Re-membering Abundance-based Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  19. Pingback: Guest post — Consciously Choosing Abundance-driven Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  20. Pingback: Our Myth Story « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s