Do you still use a 1950s washing machine?
While some of you might, most of you are probably not. Yet, many of you are probably still using 1950s agreements of what human interactions look like.
Why would most of us update our music and laundry technology and not the technology for human interactions? We update the first, because the benefits of the newer technologies are obvious. Much cooler and much more efficient access to much more music, or better clothes-washing care for the price. When it comes to human agreements, we tend not to see the implicit, embedded assumptions in our agreements. We still unconsciously accept the 1950s idea that most people are cogs in a machine that bring specific, interchangeable capacities to a task, and that they simply need to be contracted and compensated for the pound of flesh exacted from them at work.
Current research shows that, across the planet, people working under these 1950s agreements are disengaged at work and that the costs of this disengagement are huge. Alternatively, we have documented tens of thousands of cases of groups that are working with 2010s agreements, updated technology, that assume people are quite competent, excited to engage, and ready to learn, all of the time, and that when they are treated this way and invited to contribute their best, they most often do, and that the net benefits to groups working this way are huge.
If you periodically update the technology that plays your music and washes your clothes, maybe you should consider updating the technology for how you interact with others at work.