Connecting three dots.
- Vast amounts of people, globally, are disengaged at work.
- Some people are highly engaged at work, and get far better results, sustainably.
- Treating lab animals poorly seems to be decreasing experimental reproducibility of science.
In a piece just out in the prestigious academic journal Science, Stanford University researcher Joseph Garner suggests, “We’re trying to control these animals so much, they’re no longer useful…If we want animals to tell us about stuff that’s going to happen in people, we need to treat them more like people.” Seeing how most people treat other people in the workplace (see earlier reference to the vastly disengaged workforce), maybe these scientists are arguing that people should treat lab animals better than most people treat people.
If the challenge with lab animals is how to ensure that the animals being tested are in similar conditions, to maximize reproducibility, thus the desire to minimize the number of variables in their living environment, might the challenge with how to treat people also extend beyond energy-depleting cubicle farms?
If nobody had ever tried to figure out how to treat lab animals well AND get good, reproducible results, and if nobody had ever tried to figure out how to celebrate the creative contributions of every individual in a group, then we would really be in deep trouble. What to do? Fortunately, there are many people who are figuring this out, and they have been for decades. We just need to find them and to understand what they are doing. This is the next frontier for science, at least with people. How do we need to understand human interactions and human agreements to be able to find, study, and share what those on the forefront are learning. They experience what we want to experience. Let’s find them.