Three Levels of Perceived Reality and Three Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy

The 5th in a 9-post series on Perceived Levels of Reality

Following on the previous 4 posts (starting with “Perceived Levels of Reality“) people perceive three very different levels of reality. Nouns represent the static, momentary outcomes, the capacities presenced here-now, the things. Verbs reflect the flowing, ever moving shifts in relationships and capacities experienced over time, development. The verbs put the nouns in movement. Light focuses on the possibility seen, accelerating the potential, as people participate with it. Light accelerates the verb that moves the noun.

Now I will apply these three levels of perceived reality to the experiences of harmonic vibrancy (summarized in the post “3 Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy“), through the five primary relationships. By listening to what people describe as their experience of the harmonic vibrancy in the five primary relationships (self, other, group, nature, spirit), they describe the levels of reality most available to them.

People described the inner circle, in the figure above, as an experience of scarcity. In this experience, people can only access the things-noun level of reality. In the middle circle of the same figure, the circle of occasional abundance, people can access both the development-verb level and the things-noun level. In the outer circle, where people experience abundance in all five relationships, people can access all three levels of perceived reality. The table below captures the available levels of reality for each circle of harmonic vibrancy.

Circle of Harmonic Vibrancy

Things-Noun Level

Development-Verb Level

Possibility-Light Level










Table: Levels of Reality Accessible in Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy

In the next 4 posts, I will integrate the three levels of perceived reality and the five primary relationships.



44 thoughts on “Three Levels of Perceived Reality and Three Circles of Harmonic Vibrancy

  1. It is so interesting how people and organizations not only live into and out of the reality they experience but also create completely different relations to resources of production as well as their processes of transforming the resources into value.

    I am currently working with amazing groups that push very hard in order to make the move to the next stage (since they can already see it) but in many situations they undermine their possibilities to move from verb-noun realities into light-possibility levels.

    It is amazing to notice that once using Ecosynomics and Harmonic Vibrancy as a lens to look at organizations and processes and social systems in general it is much easier to actually see what is happening. Everything gets sharper, more detailed, interconnected and colourfull. In my client interventions I have the impression that I started to be able to support my clients to see their social systems in 3D and colour instead of 2D and black and white.

    Sometimes it is challenging not to loose my clients since we (they as my clients and me as the facilitator of their processes) are still not used to a reallity full of so much potential, possibilities and abundance. I have the impression that we often want the new reality faster than we are able to life into it. Are there differences in the speed and intensity of making Harmonic Vibrancy moves?


  2. Pingback: Integrating Possibility, Development, and Things | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  3. Pingback: The Grounded-Potential Path | Institute for Strategic Clarity

  4. Pingback: Did you say, “Leading through Listening”? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  5. Pingback: People Are Self-interested AND Other-interested, Group-interested, Nature-interested, Spirit-interested — All Five at the Same Time « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  6. Pingback: Enlightened Brainstorming or Collaborative Inquiry? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  7. Pingback: A funny observation — possibility derived from now here or possibility integrated to get here now? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  8. Pingback: To Be or Not to Be, Happy with Money, That Is the Question « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  9. Pingback: Abundance in Relationship ≠ Excess « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  10. Pingback: Guest post — Self-discovery Leadership « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  11. Pingback: Guest post — Similar outcomes and experiences found in 17 European groups living the Ecosynomic paradigm (#2 in a 5-part series) « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  12. Pingback: The Mind-Body Effects of Mindful Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  13. Pingback: Re-cognizing Relational Strengths Before They Atrophy or Before We Kill Them « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  14. Pingback: Guest post — Ecosynomics: Improving Schools Strengthening Communities « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  15. Pingback: From Whims to Rules to Principles, Glimpses of the Evolution of a Big Question, “Who Decides?” « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  16. Pingback: Measuring Well-being — How Do We Know If We Are Better Off? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  17. Pingback: Experiencing Abundance in a Moment of Possibility — Two Recent Books « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  18. Pingback: Ecosynomics and Why You Care « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  19. Pingback: Perceived Levels of Reality « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  20. Pingback: The Grounded-Potential Path « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  21. Pingback: Abundance of “How Much” « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  22. Pingback: Three Levels of Reality in Resources « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  23. Pingback: History of Thinking about Resources, Organization, and Value « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  24. Pingback: Transforming Light to Verb to Noun — Three Quotes « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  25. Pingback: The Disengaged Paradox « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  26. Pingback: 4 Scenarios of HUGE Success « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  27. Pingback: Do You Extract Value, Create It, or Release Its Potential? — Part 2 — Levels of Reality Included « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  28. Pingback: Guest post — Agreements Mapping of High Vibrancy Zapatista Communities « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  29. Pingback: What Specifically Differentiates High Vibrancy Groups from Everyone Else? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  30. Pingback: Higher Vibrancy Starts with Your Self — Recommended Readings « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  31. Pingback: Ecosynomics of Surprisology — Recommended Reading « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  32. Pingback: The Reality That Is Always Here, Ready for Homo Lumens to Discover — Recommended Reading « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  33. Pingback: Is the State of Nature LOCKEd In or enLUMENSed? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  34. Pingback: Where Am I Actually Disengaged, in Your World or Mine? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  35. Pingback: The Global Initiative — The Social Topography of Human Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  36. Pingback: Seeing “What Is” — The Economics of Abundance « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  37. Pingback: Who Is First? Me, You, Us, Nature, Spirit? « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  38. Pingback: A Common Object-ive Is Not a Deeper Shared Purpose — How to Know the Difference « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  39. Pingback: Surely Everyone Else Is Disengaged in the Same Way I Am « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  40. Pingback: Vibrancy Is A Choice Checklists–Re-membering Abundance-based Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  41. Pingback: The Whole Agreements Field Is Always Active–Sometimes Towards Purpose, Often Not « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  42. Pingback: Vibrancy Is A Choice Checklists — Re-membering Abundance-based Agreements « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  43. Pingback: Your Creative PROCESS Is Not Her Networking PROCESS Is Not My Transactional PROCESS « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

  44. Pingback: Network Power — Recommended Reading « Jim Ritchie-Dunham

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s